Social media has many talents. Enhancing your brand’s reputation could be one of them.

June 14, 2011

By Federica Aperio, Ebiquity's Digital Department's Global Practice Leader and Ben Lloyd, Senior Director at Echo Research

If you've just been to a marketing conference, chances are you sat through at least a couple of presentations on social media. You may have been dazzled by claims of thousands or millions of fans gained as a result of marketing activity or you may have been sceptical. So much is claimed for social media but all too often the detail remains behind closed doors. And so much of what is claimed doesn't seem to have any relation to an accurate measure of improved performance for the business. The first part of the problem in any discussion of social media is that it's not always clear what people mean by social media. It's certainly more than Facebook - in many markets Facebook is not the leading social platform.

It also includes Twitter, YouTube, a host of blogs and forums and any other digital or mobile location where consumers can connect and converse. Critically, social media does not just mean the environments that are owned and controlled by a company but also the conversation that happens outside them, at review sites for example. The second part of the problem is that social media can deliver many different things; it can be a customer service tool, a communication vehicle and a knowledge sharing platform to name just three ways that companies have successfully utilised it.

Finally, many marketers are wary about stories of social media attacks on brands that come underfire by activists and campaigners. The perception remains that being active in social media opens brands up to potential attack.

To read the full article on Ebiquty Opinion click here


Other Links

Ebiquity Digital, Ben Lloyd blog, Ebiquity Opinion, Echo Sonar social media monitoring


Post Your Comment
Trina Trina
03/03/12   04:58:24
Excellent post as always, Jeff. A few eocmmnts:1) It's been clear for a while now that nearly all active folks on Twitter use what I call the dip model as opposed to the inbox model to read Twitter. Thus the point that it's all about timing is correct, though a bit misleading. There is absolutely a randomness to it but a brand can't go crazy over that, as there's no way to ever know the right timing of something. Serendipity will always play a role, it's true in life and reflects into social media channels.2) Managing social media channels properly for a brand (i.e. engaging via Twitter, Facebook, etc) is very time-consuming. Nearly all businesses, small and large, assign these responsibilities as extra side tasks for people in marketing roles who have otherwise very busy jobs. This is unfortunately a reality of today's economy 3) For Summer Shack (and for many other restaurants in Boston on Twitter that I've seen), I'm willing to bet they put some effort in to social media (weeks, maybe even months), but saw little or no payback from these efforts. Perhaps their customers or potential customers weren't using social media? Perhaps they struggled with finding the right communities to engage with? Perhaps these channels just weren't as productive as other traditional channels such as Google adwords, TV, etc? Whatever the case, I am definitely seeing more of this, and no longer than surprised when I see it..-= Eric Andersen s last blog .. =-.
This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Find out more here.

GB FR US DE
Region United Kingdom United States France GermanyPartners Ebiquity

Register / sign in to join the discussion