CSR Study : Crunch could reduce corporate social responsibility

In a poll by Echo Research , 36 per cent of senior professionals said they believed the number of corporate social responsibility programmes would fall ...

Novartis Study

Omnibus Survey, Echo Research, April-May 2008. [2] Ezzati et al. Selected major risk factors and global regional burden of disease. The Lancet. ...

Jolly Good Fellows with a Purpose

by David Michaelson, Echo Research.
 
2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | 2004

What the Papers Say


November 12, 2004
Introduction of Compact-Only Format

Organisation: The Times


Click here for full-size graph

Analysis and commentary by Echo Research.

The momentous day arrived: "another important date in The Times's long and extraordinary history"(Times Editor, 1/11), November 1st, the day that saw the reputed broadsheet turn compact. Assurances followed that the paper's tradition and quality would remain unaffected, its new format ensuring "The Times will continue to flourish and to perform its unique role in British society"(Times Editor, 1/11).

Certainly after almost a year of dual broadsheet / tabloid publication the circulation figures supported the premise that 'size doesn't matter'. The Times claimed the capture of younger, wealthier audience groups and was savvy enough to allow its traditional brethren expression of their views. "Sir, For nearly thirty years I have hidden behind the broadsheet Times successfully avoiding any eye contact and conversation at breakfast. Suddenly, I am expected to comment on hairstyles, holidays, housekeeping and HRT - all before 8am"(Times, 4/11).

The competitors proved more ruthless. The Telegraph proclaimed itself "the best in broadsheet journalism"(1/11), and declared the adoption of 15,000 Times' refuseniks (Sunday Times, 7/11). The Guardian, meanwhile, focused on dissension in the camps . "We are probably the most famous broadsheet newspaper in the world and we find out about it this way … you can quote me as a furious and disillusioned Times journalist"(29/10).

Message Volume
Positive
Times aired views to change in its Letters page 29
In favour of compact (like it, more successful) 26
Circ. up since introduction of compact (5%) 19
216 years history 14
Compact appealing to some readers / new audience 12
Times - high quality newspaper / influential 12
Indy's sales up since going compact (20%) 9
Compact size better for commuters 8
Quality of Times journalism a constant 8
Guardian intends Berliner format (2006) 7
Readers not lost by going compact 7
Size matters - but for a short time only 4
Number of reader complaints less than expected 3
Negative
Against compact / complaints over format 17
Sorrow / loss of tradition / wistful 10
Times readers a conservative breed 8
Telegraph - "the best in broadsheet journalism" 6
Appeals for separate sections (business / sport) 6
Telegraph - would gain Times refuseniks 5
Anger (from media planners, staff, readers) 5
Removal of the crossword from the back page 4
Financial results - high Compact production costs 4
Compact edition too thick / unwieldy / heavy 4
No forewarning of compact-only deadline 3
Ad agencies argue advert cost in compact edition 3
Inference that compact Times will be dumbed down 3

<< See All Press Releases
 
Copyright 2006 Echo Research
 
 

PR Week Echo Columns